Affiliate Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links may earn us a commission at no cost to you.

Best GPUs for Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 (2026): 5 Picks
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 is a well-optimized UE5 RPG, but it has one wrinkle most GPU guides skip: the game supports DLSS 4 and Intel XeSS, but has no AMD FSR support and no frame generation. That changes the vendor math at several price tiers. An RTX card that can lean on DLSS Quality at 1440p punches above its native raster spec; an AMD card runs on native or XeSS only, with no fallback. The picks below account for that.
Our top pick: MSI RTX 5070 Ventus 2X OC (12 GB)
The MSI RTX 5070 Ventus 2X OC is the first card that clears 60 fps at 1440p Epic natively, does it in a compact 236mm two-fan design, and has DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation available for titles where you want more headroom. For the majority of 1440p builds targeting this game, it is the pick.
Quick picks
Pick | Card | Target resolution | Where to buy |
|---|---|---|---|
Best Overall | 1440p native / DLSS headroom | Check Price | |
Best Value | 1440p DLSS Quality | Check Price | |
Best Premium | 1440p native 80+ fps / 4K DLSS | Check Price | |
Best Budget | 1080p native | Check Price | |
Editor’s Pick | 1440p AMD (XeSS only) | Check Price |
Best Overall
- Card
- Target resolution
1440p native / DLSS headroom
- Where to buy
- Check Price
Best Value
- Card
- Target resolution
1440p DLSS Quality
- Where to buy
- Check Price
Best Premium
- Card
- Target resolution
1440p native 80+ fps / 4K DLSS
- Where to buy
- Check Price
Best Budget
- Card
- Target resolution
1080p native
- Where to buy
- Check Price
Editor’s Pick
- Card
- Target resolution
1440p AMD (XeSS only)
- Where to buy
- Check Price
Specs at a glance
Card | Chip | VRAM | Bus | TDP | DLSS / Upscaling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTX 5070 | 12 GB GDDR7 | 192-bit | ~250W | DLSS 4 + MFG | |
RTX 5060 Ti | 16 GB GDDR7 | 128-bit | ~180W | DLSS 4 | |
RTX 5070 Ti | 16 GB GDDR7 | 256-bit | ~300W | DLSS 4 + MFG | |
RX 9060 XT | 16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit | ~130W | XeSS only | |
RX 9070 XT | 16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit | ~304W | XeSS only |
- Chip
RTX 5070
- VRAM
12 GB GDDR7
- Bus
192-bit
- TDP
~250W
- DLSS / Upscaling
DLSS 4 + MFG
- Chip
RTX 5060 Ti
- VRAM
16 GB GDDR7
- Bus
128-bit
- TDP
~180W
- DLSS / Upscaling
DLSS 4
- Chip
RTX 5070 Ti
- VRAM
16 GB GDDR7
- Bus
256-bit
- TDP
~300W
- DLSS / Upscaling
DLSS 4 + MFG
- Chip
RX 9060 XT
- VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
- Bus
128-bit
- TDP
~130W
- DLSS / Upscaling
XeSS only
- Chip
RX 9070 XT
- VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
- Bus
256-bit
- TDP
~304W
- DLSS / Upscaling
XeSS only
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 GPU benchmarks
Average fps at 1080p Epic quality preset, no upscaling.
- 100 FPS
- 68 FPS
- 80 FPS
- 63 FPS
- 52 FPS
Average fps at 1440p Epic quality preset, no upscaling.
- 85 FPS
- 62 FPS
- 52 FPS
- 47 FPS
- 38 FPS
NVIDIA cards use DLSS 4 Quality. AMD cards use XeSS Quality. The gap reflects the lack of FSR support in this title.
- 115 FPS
- 85 FPS
- 68 FPS
- 68 FPS
- 52 FPS
How we picked
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 runs on Unreal Engine 5 with Lumen and Nanite, and it is one of the cleaner UE5 releases. What makes the GPU decision non-obvious is the upscaler situation.
The game ships with DLSS 4 and Intel XeSS. There is no AMD FSR support. That means every NVIDIA card has DLSS Quality mode as a performance lever, while AMD cards run native or XeSS only. At 1440p, DLSS Quality on an RTX 5060 Ti delivers near-native visual quality at 1080p rendering cost. The gap is real in this title.
The game uses about 9 GB of VRAM at 1440p Epic. The 16 GB cards in this guide have no ceiling here. For Lumen, the “High” preset is a modest step down from “Epic” with a useful performance gain. “Low” disables Lumen entirely. Picks below are evaluated at Epic.
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 system requirements
The official requirements list two tiers. Minimum is a GTX 1660, RX 5500 XT or Arc A380 alongside an i7-8700K or Ryzen 5 1600X and 8 GB of system RAM, and it targets 1080p at 30 fps on Low. Recommended is an RTX 3070 or RX 6800 XT with an i7-11700K or Ryzen 5 5600X and 16 GB of RAM, targeting 1080p at 60 fps on High.
Those tiers stop at 1080p, so the number worth planning around is VRAM. At Epic the game asks for roughly 8 GB at 1080p, 9 GB at 1440p and 10 GB at 4K. An 8 GB card is not locked out of Epic at 1080p, but it has no headroom left, and at 1440p it starts running out. Every pick below carries 12 GB or more for that reason.
If you already own a graphics card, check it against that floor before you buy anything. An RTX 3060 12 GB clears 1080p 60 with DLSS set to Quality, and the game stays playable on hardware as old as a GTX 1060 or RX 580 once you drop to Low. The picks below are for builders who want Epic held at a specific resolution, not for anyone who just needs the game to run.
Best Budget: Gigabyte RX 9060 XT Gaming OC (16 GB)

Specs
GPU | RX 9060 XT (RDNA 4) |
Memory | 16 GB GDDR6 |
Memory bus | 128-bit |
Boost clock | 2700 MHz |
Interface | PCIe 5.0 |
Cooler | Three-slot |
Power | About 130W typical gaming load |
GPU
RX 9060 XT (RDNA 4)
Memory
16 GB GDDR6
Memory bus
128-bit
Boost clock
2700 MHz
Interface
PCIe 5.0
Cooler
Three-slot
Power
About 130W typical gaming load
What it does well
Native 1080p Epic lands around 50 to 55 fps. RDNA 4 is a real raster step up from previous-gen AMD, and 16 GB of VRAM is more than this game needs at any resolution. The Gigabyte Gaming OC cooler runs quiet on a single 8-pin connector. In games that support FSR 4, this card scales up considerably; Clair Obscur is the exception. For a broader 1440p GPU guide, this card sits at the bottom of the usable 1440p range.
What you give up
No FSR means you’re running native or XeSS only. At 1080p Epic, the RX 9060 XT hits 50 to 55 fps natively, close enough to the 60 fps floor that dropping a setting helps. XeSS is available and adds headroom, but it doesn’t reach DLSS 4 levels. At 1440p native, performance falls to the high 30s; XeSS Quality brings it back to the low 50s.
Who it’s for
The 1080p builder on a hard budget who already runs AMD or whose library is mostly FSR-supported titles. If this game is a primary reason you’re buying, the DLSS gap at 1440p makes the RTX picks below worth the extra budget.
Best Value: ASUS Dual RTX 5060 Ti OC (16 GB)

Specs
GPU | RTX 5060 Ti (Blackwell) |
Memory | 16 GB GDDR7 |
Memory bus | 128-bit |
Boost clock | 2632 MHz OC |
Upscaling | DLSS 4 |
Interface | PCIe 5.0 |
Cooler | 2.5-slot |
Power | About 180W TDP |
GPU
RTX 5060 Ti (Blackwell)
Memory
16 GB GDDR7
Memory bus
128-bit
Boost clock
2632 MHz OC
Upscaling
DLSS 4
Interface
PCIe 5.0
Cooler
2.5-slot
Power
About 180W TDP
What it does well
DLSS 4 Quality at 1440p puts this card in the 65 to 70 fps range, delivering near-native visual quality at lower rendering cost. The 2.5-slot form factor fits tight cases, and at roughly 180W it runs on a standard 8-pin connector with no 12V-2x6 adapter concerns. Thermals are solid. The 16 GB GDDR7 is not a VRAM ceiling in this game at any resolution.
What you give up
The 128-bit memory bus is the ceiling at 4K; GDDR7 compensates for bandwidth but native 4K is a stretch. The “OC Edition” factory boost is a token 30 MHz. Confirm your board’s primary PCIe slot is x16 native; some older boards run this card x8. The Dual line is ASUS’s entry cooler, below TUF, and runs a few degrees warmer under sustained load.
Who it’s for
1440p builders who want DLSS 4 without spending above the mid-range. Upgraders from 3060-class cards wanting UE5 headroom. SFF builders needing a compact footprint.
Best Overall: MSI RTX 5070 Ventus 2X OC (12 GB)

Specs
GPU | RTX 5070 (Blackwell) |
Memory | 12 GB GDDR7 |
Memory bus | 192-bit |
Boost clock | 2557 MHz |
Upscaling | DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation |
Interface | PCIe 5.0 |
Cooler | Two-fan |
Power | About 250W TDP |
GPU
RTX 5070 (Blackwell)
Memory
12 GB GDDR7
Memory bus
192-bit
Boost clock
2557 MHz
Upscaling
DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation
Interface
PCIe 5.0
Cooler
Two-fan
Power
About 250W TDP
What it does well
The RTX 5070 is the first card that hits 60 fps at 1440p Epic natively. With DLSS Quality enabled, that climbs to the mid-80s. Multi Frame Generation is available for users who want extra headroom.
The Ventus 2X is 236mm long, shorter than most 3-fan cards, and it fits cases that would reject a 3.125-slot design. At 250W, a 750W PSU handles it cleanly. For a deeper look at where the RTX 5070 Ti and RX 9070 XT compare at the next tier up, the head-to-head guide covers the raster tradeoffs.
What you give up
12 GB of VRAM is the one concern. The game uses about 9 GB at 1440p Epic now; future UE5 titles will push past that sooner than a 16 GB card would. AMD’s RX 9070 XT ships 16 GB at a comparable price, making that a real platform trade-off. The two-fan Ventus runs 65 to 77 degrees Celsius in cases with normal airflow; a 3-fan variant runs cooler.
Who it’s for
1440p 144Hz builders who want 60 fps natively in UE5 titles. Compact-case owners who need a shorter card. Upgraders from 3070/4070 class.
Best Premium: ASUS TUF RTX 5070 Ti OC (16 GB)

Specs
GPU | RTX 5070 Ti (Blackwell) |
Memory | 16 GB GDDR7 |
Memory bus | 256-bit |
Boost clock | 2610 MHz OC |
Upscaling | DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation |
Interface | PCIe 5.0 |
Cooler | 3.125-slot |
Power | About 300W TDP |
GPU
RTX 5070 Ti (Blackwell)
Memory
16 GB GDDR7
Memory bus
256-bit
Boost clock
2610 MHz OC
Upscaling
DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation
Interface
PCIe 5.0
Cooler
3.125-slot
Power
About 300W TDP
What it does well
At 1440p, the RTX 5070 Ti runs 80 to 90 fps natively at Epic and 110 to 120 fps with DLSS Quality. It is the first card where 4K is genuinely unlocked: DLSS Quality at 4K hits 60-plus fps in this title.
The 16 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus fixes both bandwidth and VRAM concerns. The TUF cooling is among the better solutions at this tier: phase-change thermal pad, dual-ball bearing fans, and temperatures that stay below 70 degrees Celsius under sustained load.
What you give up
The price step over the RTX 5070 is steep for roughly 20 to 25 percent more native raster. If 1440p at 60 fps with DLSS is the actual target, the RTX 5070 does it at a lower price.
The 3.125-slot design needs case clearance. The included 12V-2x6 Y-adapter has caused power delivery issues for multiple buyers. A dedicated 3x8-pin to 16-pin cable is the right solution. Minimum PSU is 850W.
Who it’s for
1440p 144Hz buyers who want native fps without upscaling dependence. 4K buyers targeting 60-plus fps in UE5 titles. Content creators where Tensor Core density matters.
Editor’s Pick (AMD): Sapphire Pulse RX 9070 XT (16 GB)

Specs
GPU | RX 9070 XT (RDNA 4) |
Memory | 16 GB GDDR6 |
Memory bus | 256-bit |
Boost clock | 2970 MHz |
Interface | PCIe 5.0 |
Cooler | Triple-fan |
Power | About 304W typical gaming load |
GPU
RX 9070 XT (RDNA 4)
Memory
16 GB GDDR6
Memory bus
256-bit
Boost clock
2970 MHz
Interface
PCIe 5.0
Cooler
Triple-fan
Power
About 304W typical gaming load
What it does well
In pure raster, the RX 9070 XT competes with the RTX 5070 in this title and wins in several AMD-favored games. The Sapphire Pulse is the class-leading AIB for this chip: Honeywell PTM7950 thermal pad, quiet fans under 60 degrees Celsius at steady-state, and strong VRM thermals. The 16 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus is the right spec for upcoming UE5 games.
The how to choose a GPU guide covers the AMD-vs-Nvidia decision in broader terms for buyers weighing vendor choice across their full library.
What you give up
No FSR in this game means XeSS and native only. The RX 9070 XT runs 50 to 55 fps natively at 1440p and 65 to 70 fps with XeSS Quality. The RTX 5070 runs 62 fps natively and 85 fps with DLSS Quality in the same scene, at a lower price point. The DLSS advantage in this title is real. The 9070 XT wins in FSR-supported games; this is the exception.
Power draw is higher than the RTX 5070 under load. A 750W PSU is the floor; 850W is the right spec with system headroom accounted for.
Who it’s for
Committed AMD users whose library is mostly FSR-supported, with this game as an exception. Linux and open-source-first buyers. Anyone who prioritizes 16 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus over DLSS access.
Bottom line
For most 1440p builders, the MSI RTX 5070 Ventus 2X OC is the call. It clears 60 fps at 1440p Epic natively, runs compact, and DLSS 4 adds headroom when needed. For 4K or more native headroom at 1440p, the ASUS TUF RTX 5070 Ti OC is the step up. Budget AMD builders will find the Gigabyte RX 9060 XT handles 1080p well, with the understanding that this game has no FSR. For committed AMD at 1440p, the Sapphire Pulse RX 9070 XT is the pick, running XeSS rather than FSR in this title.
FAQ
Does Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 support AMD FSR or frame generation?
No. The game supports NVIDIA DLSS 4 and Intel XeSS, but has no AMD FSR support and no frame generation of any kind. AMD owners run on XeSS or native only.
Can I run Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 at 1440p and 60fps? What GPU do I need?
With DLSS 4 Quality, an RTX 5060 Ti reaches 65 to 70 fps at 1440p Epic. Natively, an RTX 5070 is needed to clear 60 fps at 1440p without upscaling. AMD users with the RX 9070 XT reach 65 to 70 fps at 1440p using XeSS Quality.
Is DLSS 4 quality mode worth using in Clair Obscur: Expedition 33?
Yes. With no FSR option in this title, DLSS 4 Quality is the only efficient upscaling path. At 1440p it adds 30 to 40 percent more fps at near-native visual quality. For RTX card owners, enabling it is the right default.
How much VRAM does Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 require at 1440p and 4K?
Around 9 GB at 1440p Epic, about 10 GB at 4K Epic. An 8 GB card is tight at Epic settings but workable at High. The RTX 5070's 12 GB covers this title cleanly; upcoming UE5 games will push closer to that ceiling over time.
Can an AMD GPU like the RX 9070 XT run Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 well without FSR?
Acceptably at 1440p with XeSS Quality: 65 to 70 fps. The RTX 5070 at a lower price delivers 85 fps with DLSS Quality in the same scene. The DLSS gap is real in this title specifically. In most FSR-supported games, the comparison flips.
What are the best PC settings for Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 to hit 60fps?
Drop Global Illumination to "High" from "Epic" for about 4 percent more fps with minimal visual difference. Shadows to "High" also helps. Texture quality can stay at maximum on cards with 10 GB or more VRAM. Enable DLSS Quality if you're on NVIDIA, or XeSS Quality if on Intel or AMD. Motion blur and depth of field are free to reduce.
Related Articles

How to Choose a GPU (and a Monitor That Matches)
A buyer's framework for picking a GPU and the monitor that pairs with it. Start with the panel and work the card back.
May 17, 2026

RTX 5070 Ti vs RX 9070 XT (2026): Which GPU Wins?
RTX 5070 Ti vs RX 9070 XT in 2026, picked by buyer scenario. Where each GPU wins at 1080p, 1440p, 4K, ray tracing, esports, and value.
Aug 30, 2025

Best GPUs for 1440p Gaming (2026): 5 16GB Picks, 60-240Hz
The best GPUs for 1440p gaming in 2026: five 16GB picks matched to 60, 144, and 240 Hz targets, with real benchmarks, trade-offs, and who each card fits.
Aug 8, 2026

PC Building Guide 2026: Every Step From Parts to Boot
PC building guide for 2026: choose the 8 core parts, assemble them step by step, set up BIOS and EXPO, install Windows 11, and boot your first gaming PC.
Sep 1, 2026

Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 9950X3D: Which 16-Core X3D Wins in 2026?
Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 9950X3D: which 16-core X3D to buy in 2026. Gaming and productivity benchmarks, power draw, and a straight call for upgraders and builders.
Sep 1, 2026