Skip to main content

Affiliate Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links may earn us a commission at no cost to you.

Should You Wait for the Intel Arc B770? Not Anymore (2026)

Should You Wait for the Intel Arc B770? Not Anymore (2026)

By · FounderPublished Oct 4, 2026

No. Stop waiting for the Intel Arc B770. The gaming card Intel never formally announced is not coming, and the silicon it was supposed to use already shipped in March 2026 as the Arc Pro B70, a workstation and AI card with 32GB of memory and a professional price tag.

That leaves the real question in its place: what do you buy in the slot the B770 was going to fill? Four cards cover it, from a tight budget up to 1440p ultra headroom. Here is the short version, then the reporting behind the verdict.

At a glance

The four cards that cover the tier the Arc B770 was aimed at.

What happened to the Arc B770

The waiting population built up over a year of leaks. In September 2025, Notebookcheck relayed a Moore's Law Is Dead report that had the B770 alive and due that quarter with 32 Xe cores, a 256-bit bus and roughly RTX 4070 class performance. The same report said Intel had pulled the next-generation Celestial desktop GPU from its roadmap, which should have been the first warning.

The card never showed. TweakTown noted its absence at CES in January 2026, and later that month Igor's Lab and the leaker SquashBionic both reported the consumer B770 cancelled as financially unviable, with the BMG-G31 silicon redirected to the professional segment. On 25 March 2026 Intel announced the Arc Pro B70 and B65 on exactly that die: 32 Xe cores, 32GB of GDDR6, aimed at AI inference and professional graphics. No gaming variant. The chip people were waiting for is on sale right now, in a workstation.

The reason everyone cites is memory. DRAM contract pricing climbed through 2026 as AI demand soaked up supply, and both NVIDIA and AMD pushed board-price increases through their partners. A 16GB consumer card at a mid-range price stopped penciling out, and that same squeeze is raising what you pay for everything below. If you are weighing a similar wait on the NVIDIA side, the Super refresh question has its own answer.

Which card should you buy instead?

Pick your scenario, get the card.

Benchmarks

1440p test-suite average (native, no upscaling)

Suite averages for the two mainstream picks, both at 1440p with upscaling off.

Source: Hardware Unboxed via TechSpot, Radeon RX 9060 XT review.

The other two picks sit outside that chart on purpose: different reviews, different test suites. For reference, TechSpot's Arc B580 re-review put that card well ahead of the RTX 4060 at 1440p, and reviewer testing has the RX 9070 XT near 133 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 at native 1440p.

How we picked

Resolution sets the floor. At 1440p the memory floor is 12GB and 16GB is what you want, which is exactly the spec that made the B770 interesting. Every card here clears 12GB; three clear 16GB.

Upscaling counts, within limits. DLSS 4 and FSR 4 both hold up at Quality presets at 1440p. Frame generation is a smoothness multiplier, not a performance level: it turns 60 into 120, never 30 into 120. A card sold on a frame-generated number is a slower card with arithmetic attached.

The last filter is availability. A card you can order today beats a card that might exist later, which is the whole point of this page. For the longer framework, how to choose a GPU and the display that matches covers the full decision.

Best overall now: ASRock Challenger RX 9060 XT 16GB

ASRock Radeon RX 9060 XT Challenger 16GB OC, RDNA 4, 3290MHz Boost, 16GB GDDR6 128-bit, PCIe 5.0, Dual Fans, 0dB Silent, LED Indicator, DisplayPort 2.1a, HDMI 2.1b
ASRock Radeon RX 9060 XT Challenger 16GB OC, RDNA 4, 3290MHz Boost, 16GB GDDR6 128-bit, PCIe 5.0, Dual Fans, 0dB Silent, LED Indicator, DisplayPort 2.1a, HDMI 2.1b
$519.99

Specs

  • Chip

    Radeon RX 9060 XT (RDNA 4)

  • VRAM

    16GB GDDR6

  • Memory bus

    128-bit

  • Boost clock

    3290 MHz

  • Interface

    PCIe 5.0

  • Cooling

    Dual fan, 0dB idle

  • Outputs

    DisplayPort 2.1a, HDMI 2.1b

  • Upscaling

    FSR 4

What it does well

This is the card sitting in the slot the B770 was aimed at. 16GB at a mainstream price was the headline spec of the rumoured Intel part, and the Radeon delivers it today. At 1440p that buffer is the difference between dropping textures in two years and never thinking about it.

Raster is strong for the tier. Hardware Unboxed's 1440p suite put it within roughly five percent of the RTX 5060 Ti on average, close enough that the choice comes down to what you do with the card. FSR 4 closed most of the gap to DLSS at Quality, so upscaling is a real option rather than a concession.

What you give up

The 128-bit bus is the structural limit: stack high-resolution textures and ray tracing and the card runs short on bandwidth before it runs short on memory. Ray tracing trails NVIDIA at this tier, and anything touching CUDA, Blender or a local AI model puts you on the wrong side of the fence.

ASRock's Challenger is not an AIB line we reach for first; it earns its place on the 16GB spec, not the cooler. Watch the listing too: the 8GB RX 9060 XT carries nearly the same name and shows up cheaper. At 1440p it is a different card.

Who it's for

You game at 1440p, your library leans raster, and you were waiting on the B770 for its memory buffer. You do not stream or render.

Best for ray tracing and creator work: MSI RTX 5060 Ti 16G Shadow 2X OC

msi Gaming RTX 5060 Ti 16G Shadow 2X OC Graphics Card (16GB GDDR7, 128-bit, Extreme Performance: TBA MHz, DisplayPort x 3 2.1a, HDMI 2.1b, NVIDIA Blackwell Architecture)
msi Gaming RTX 5060 Ti 16G Shadow 2X OC Graphics Card (16GB GDDR7, 128-bit, Extreme Performance: TBA MHz, DisplayPort x 3 2.1a, HDMI 2.1b, NVIDIA Blackwell Architecture)
$789.98

Specs

  • Chip

    GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (Blackwell)

  • VRAM

    16GB GDDR7

  • Memory bus

    128-bit

  • Memory speed

    28 Gbps

  • Interface

    PCIe 5.0

  • Cooling

    Dual fan

  • Outputs

    3x DisplayPort 2.1a, HDMI 2.1b

  • Upscaling

    DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation

What it does well

Club386 read Intel's Arc Pro B70 numbers as putting a hypothetical gaming B770 around RTX 5060 Ti territory. This is that performance class, shipping, with 16GB of GDDR7 behind it. If your model of the B770 was mid-range money with more memory, the 16GB 5060 Ti is the closest thing on shelves.

The feature stack is what the extra money buys. DLSS 4's transformer model at Quality belongs in the buying decision at 1440p, not the footnotes. Ray tracing is playable here in a way it is not on the Radeon, NVENC AV1 matters if you stream, and CUDA matters the moment you open Blender.

What you give up

Price, mostly. This is the most expensive way into the tier, and the raster gap to the 16GB Radeon does not cover the difference. The 128-bit bus is the same structural limit, so what you gain is features rather than bandwidth.

Skip the 8GB RTX 5060 Ti. It shares the model name and should not be a 1440p purchase in 2026. Buyers have flagged how easy the two listings are to confuse.

Who it's for

You play ray-traced titles, you stream, or you render. The CUDA tax flips the equation and this becomes the obvious pick rather than the expensive one.

Best budget: Sparkle Arc B580 Titan OC

Sparkle Intel Arc B580 Titan OC, 12GB GDDR6, Torn Cooling 2.0, Axial Fan, Breathing Light, Metal Backplate, SB580T-12GOC
Sparkle Intel Arc B580 Titan OC, 12GB GDDR6, Torn Cooling 2.0, Axial Fan, Breathing Light, Metal Backplate, SB580T-12GOC
$369.99

Specs

  • Chip

    Intel Arc B580 (Xe2 Battlemage)

  • VRAM

    12GB GDDR6

  • Memory bus

    192-bit

  • Interface

    PCIe 4.0 x8

  • Cooling

    Torn Cooling 2.0 axial fans

  • Outputs

    DisplayPort 2.1, HDMI 2.1

  • Upscaling

    XeSS 2

  • Extras

    Metal backplate

What it does well

If you were waiting on the B770 because you wanted Intel specifically, this is the only answer. The B580 tops Intel's consumer Battlemage stack now that the bigger die has gone professional.

It holds up on value. 12GB on a budget card reads well against the 8GB competition, and the cost per frame is the best here by a clear margin. XeSS 2 also runs on Intel's own XMX hardware path rather than the weaker fallback other vendors get.

What you give up

This is a 1080p card that reaches into 1440p, not a 1440p card. We mapped where that line falls in whether the B580 is enough at 1440p, and in the tier below it if your budget is tighter still.

Drivers are far better than the Alchemist era, but older DX9 and DX11 titles still surface problems, and reports suggest Arc cards lose disproportionate performance on an older CPU because of driver overhead. Supply has been the least reliable of anything here.

Who it's for

You play at 1080p on a high-refresh panel, budget is the binding constraint, and you would rather own a card than refresh rumour threads.

Best step-up: Sapphire Pulse RX 9070 XT

Sapphire 11348-03-20G Pulse AMD Radeon™ RX 9070 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA 4
Sapphire 11348-03-20G Pulse AMD Radeon™ RX 9070 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA 4
$884.38

Specs

  • Chip

    Radeon RX 9070 XT (RDNA 4)

  • VRAM

    16GB GDDR6

  • Memory bus

    256-bit

  • Interface

    PCIe 5.0

  • Cooling

    Triple fan

  • Outputs

    2x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort

  • Manufacturer SKU

    11348-03-20G

  • Upscaling

    FSR 4

What it does well

Some people waiting on the B770 were not waiting for a mainstream card. They wanted 1440p ultra without thinking about it, and hoped Intel would make that cheap. The 256-bit bus doubles what the mainstream picks get, with the same 16GB behind it.

Reviewer testing lands it near 133 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 at native 1440p, a different conversation from the cards above. Sapphire's Pulse is one of the mid-tier AIB lines worth reaching for, and the triple-fan cooler is sized for the power draw rather than the spec sheet.

What you give up

The jump in price is large, which is why this is a step-up rather than the default. If the budget does not stretch, the 16GB RX 9060 XT is the honest answer, and whether you need the step-up walks through where that line falls.

Ray tracing still trails NVIDIA, stock has been thin all generation, and the Pulse is a long card. Measure your case before you order.

Who it's for

You want 1440p ultra headroom and can absorb the jump. Your library is raster-led, or you accept that ray-traced titles will lean on FSR 4.

Bottom line

If you game at 1440p and your library is raster-led, buy the ASRock Challenger RX 9060 XT 16GB. If you ray trace, stream or render, buy the MSI RTX 5060 Ti 16G Shadow 2X OC. If budget is the binding constraint and you play at 1080p, buy the Sparkle Arc B580 Titan OC. If you want ultra-preset headroom at 1440p, buy the Sapphire Pulse RX 9070 XT.

Whichever one fits, buy it now. The B770 is not coming back, and memory pricing is moving the wrong way. We will revisit this page by 13 December 2026, or sooner if Intel says something new. For the wider field at this resolution, our 1440p GPU guide goes broader.

FAQ

Is the Intel Arc B770 actually cancelled?

Intel never formally announced a gaming B770, so there is nothing official to cancel. What exists is reporting: Igor's Lab and the leaker SquashBionic both said in January 2026 that the consumer card had been dropped as financially unviable, and Intel shipped the same silicon in March as the workstation Arc Pro B70. Treat it as dead until Intel says otherwise.

What is the Intel Arc Pro B70, and can you game on it?

It is the professional card built on the die the B770 was going to use: 32 Xe cores and 32GB of GDDR6, announced on 25 March 2026. It will render frames, but it is priced and driver-tuned for AI inference and professional graphics, not for games.

Is the Intel Arc B580 still worth buying in 2026?

For 1080p high-refresh gaming on a tight budget, yes. 12GB and the best cost per frame in this guide carry it. It is not a 1440p card, older DX9 and DX11 titles still cause trouble, and supply has been the shakiest of anything here.

Will Intel make another gaming graphics card after Battlemage?

Unclear, and the signals are not encouraging. The same September 2025 report that kept the B770 alive also said Intel had pulled the Celestial desktop GPU from its roadmap, and nothing since has contradicted it. Buy on what Intel ships today, not on a roadmap.

Should I wait for GPU prices to come down instead?

Nothing in the current reporting points that way. DRAM contract pricing has risen through 2026 on AI demand, and both NVIDIA and AMD have passed increases to their board partners. Analysts expect the squeeze to run for years, so waiting for a dip looks like the worse bet.

What would the Arc B770 have competed with?

The leaked configuration was 32 Xe cores on a 256-bit bus with 16GB of memory, which reporting placed around RTX 4070 performance. Club386 read the Arc Pro B70's numbers as landing a gaming version near the RTX 5060 Ti. Both targets are on this page, with the memory to match.