Skip to main content

Affiliate Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links may earn us a commission at no cost to you.

RX 5700 XT to RX 9070 XT: Is the Upgrade Worth It? (2026)

RX 5700 XT to RX 9070 XT: Is the Upgrade Worth It? (2026)

By · FounderPublished Oct 27, 2026

Yes, and for a reason that goes beyond frame rate. The RX 5700 XT has no hardware ray tracing, so a growing list of new releases will not launch on it at all, and it can never run FSR 4. The RX 9070 XT fixes both, doubles your VRAM to 16 GB, and lands at close to triple the frame rate at 1440p.

The real decision is which RDNA 4 card. Buy the XT if your power supply has headroom. Buy the non-XT RX 9070 if it does not, because that card draws less than the 5700 XT you are pulling out.

At a glance

  • Architecture

    RX 5700 XT (what you own)

    RDNA 1

    RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)

    RDNA 4

  • VRAM

    RX 5700 XT (what you own)

    8 GB GDDR6

    RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)

    16 GB GDDR6

  • Memory bus

    RX 5700 XT (what you own)

    256-bit

    RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)

    256-bit

  • Stream processors

    RX 5700 XT (what you own)

    2,560

    RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)

    4,096

  • Hardware ray tracing

    RX 5700 XT (what you own)

    None

    RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)

    Yes, RDNA 4 ray accelerators

  • Upscaling ceiling

    RX 5700 XT (what you own)

    FSR 3.1

    RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)

    FSR 4

  • Board power

    RX 5700 XT (what you own)

    225 W

    RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)

    304 W

  • Interface

    RX 5700 XT (what you own)

    PCIe 4.0 x16

    RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)

    PCIe 5.0 x16

Where the upgrade pays off

Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty at 1440p

Relative performance with the RX 5700 XT set to 100.

  • RX 5700 XT
    100 %
  • RX 9070
    286 %
Source: TechSpot, 6 Years of Mid-Range Radeon GPUs Tested, 2026.
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 (basic preset)

Relative performance with the RX 5700 XT set to 100.

  • RX 5700 XT
    100 %
  • RX 9070
    267 %
Source: TechSpot, 6 Years of Mid-Range Radeon GPUs Tested, 2026.
Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered at 1440p (medium)

Relative performance with the RX 5700 XT set to 100.

  • RX 5700 XT
    100 %
  • RX 9070
    256 %
Source: TechSpot, 6 Years of Mid-Range Radeon GPUs Tested, 2026.

What changes when you swap the card

Start with the lockout, because it is new. The 5700 XT launched before AMD put ray tracing hardware on Radeon, and games have started to require it. Indiana Jones and the Great Circle and Doom: The Dark Ages both need a ray tracing capable GPU to start, so on a 5700 XT the question is not which settings to drop. The game simply does not run. Every RDNA 4 card in this article clears that bar.

Then upscaling. FSR 4 is RDNA 4 only, and a 5700 XT is capped at FSR 3.1 for good. Community workarounds that bring FSR 4 to older Radeon cards target the RX 6000 and RX 7000 series, and reports suggest RDNA 1 is not a practical candidate. Our DLSS and FSR comparison covers what the newer upscaler changes in practice.

Then memory. The 5700 XT carries 8 GB, and 8 GB is the trap of this generation: new releases at 1440p already trim texture quality to fit it. Going to 16 GB is a durability argument as much as a frame-rate one, and our 16GB VRAM breakdown shows where that headroom gets spent.

Power is where the XT and non-XT split. The 5700 XT is a 225 W board. The 9070 XT is a 304 W board, and AMD's minimum power supply recommendation for it is 750 W. The 9070 is a 220 W board with a 650 W recommendation, which means it fits almost any system that ran a 5700 XT without a second purchase.

Last, the platform. A lot of 5700 XT systems are B450 or X470 boards with a Ryzen 3000 chip, which run the graphics slot at PCIe 3.0. An x16 RDNA 4 card loses little there. The older CPU is the bigger limit, especially at 1080p, so check it against our CPU pairings for the 9070 XT before you assume the card is the only part to change.

The upgrade to buy: Sapphire Pulse RX 9070 XT

This is the card to buy if your power supply can take it.

Sapphire 11348-03-20G Pulse AMD Radeon™ RX 9070 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA 4
Sapphire 11348-03-20G Pulse AMD Radeon™ RX 9070 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA 4

Specs

  • Chip

    Radeon RX 9070 XT (RDNA 4)

  • VRAM

    16 GB GDDR6

  • Memory bus

    256-bit

  • Stream processors

    4,096

  • Boost clock

    2970 MHz

  • Board power

    304 W

  • Cooling

    Triple fan (Pulse)

  • Interface

    PCIe 5.0 x16

What it does well

The 9070 XT is the clearest AMD value win of this generation, and it is the full version of the step this article is about. TechSpot measured the non-XT 9070 at 156% to 186% ahead of a 5700 XT across its per-game results, and the XT runs about 8% ahead of the 9070 on top of that. At 1440p that is the difference between negotiating settings and leaving them on high.

Sapphire's Pulse line is the one we keep coming back to at the mid tier. The cooler stays quiet under load, build quality holds from one generation to the next, and the SKU on the box is the SKU you ordered, which matters on a chip where the XT and non-XT listings sit side by side.

You also get every RDNA 4 feature gate at once: hardware ray tracing that makes the lockout titles playable, FSR 4, 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, and PCIe 5.0, which a PCIe 3.0 board simply runs at its own speed.

What you give up

Power, and it is the whole counterpoint. You are going from a 225 W card to a 304 W card, and AMD wants 750 W behind it. A quality modern 650 W unit can carry it, as our 650 W breakdown explains, but a budget unit bought for the 5700 XT years ago is the wrong place to test that. If you need a new unit, our power supply picks for the RX 9070 family cover it.

The extra 79 W also lands inside a case that was only ever handling the old card. A case with one intake fan and a solid front panel will feel the difference.

Who it's for

A 5700 XT owner on a 1440p high-refresh or 4K 60 Hz panel, with a power supply that has real headroom, who wants to buy once and skip the next upgrade cycle.

The lower-power pick: ASRock RX 9070 Challenger OC

The same generational jump, without touching the power supply.

ASRock Radeon RX 9070 Challenger 16GB OC Graphics Card, RDNA 4, 2520MHz Boost, 16GB GDDR6 256-bit, PCIe 5.0, Triple Fans, 0dB Silent, LED Indicator
ASRock Radeon RX 9070 Challenger 16GB OC Graphics Card, RDNA 4, 2520MHz Boost, 16GB GDDR6 256-bit, PCIe 5.0, Triple Fans, 0dB Silent, LED Indicator
$699.99

Specs

  • Chip

    Radeon RX 9070 (RDNA 4)

  • VRAM

    16 GB GDDR6

  • Memory bus

    256-bit

  • Stream processors

    3,584

  • Boost clock

    2520 MHz

  • Board power

    220 W

  • Cooling

    Triple fan, 0 dB idle

  • Interface

    PCIe 5.0 x16

What it does well

The non-XT 9070 is the card TechSpot used to measure the gap: close to triple the 5700 XT in Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty at 1440p, and more than two and a half times in Black Ops 6 and Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered. You give up roughly 8% against the XT and keep every feature.

The power story is the rare good news in a GPU upgrade. At 220 W it draws slightly less than the 225 W card it replaces, so the power supply and cables that ran your 5700 XT already cover it. For anyone on an older unit, that removes a second purchase and a rebuild from the plan.

ASRock ships the Challenger with a triple-fan cooler and a zero-RPM idle mode, so it stays silent on the desktop. At 220 W the cooler has an easy job, which is why the idle mode is usable rather than decoration.

What you give up

Challenger is ASRock's entry cooler tier, below Steel Legend and Taichi. It handles 220 W without drama, but under a long session it is audibly working where a heavier cooler would not be.

The bigger giveaway is positional. The 9070 sits close enough to the XT that buyers who could have stretched tend to notice later, and our RX 9070 vs RX 9070 XT comparison puts numbers on that gap. If your power supply has headroom and the price gap is small, the XT is the better buy.

Who it's for

A 5700 XT owner on an older or 650 W-class power supply, or in a quiet or compact case, who wants the full feature jump and nearly all of the performance without changing anything else in the build.

The budget step: XFX Swift RX 9060 XT 16GB

Every feature gate fixed, for the buyer whose budget is the hard limit.

XFX Swift AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT OC Triple Fan Gaming Edition with 16GB GDDR6 HDMI 2xDP, RDNA 4 RX-96TS316BA, Graphics Card, Compatible with Desktop PCs
XFX Swift AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT OC Triple Fan Gaming Edition with 16GB GDDR6 HDMI 2xDP, RDNA 4 RX-96TS316BA, Graphics Card, Compatible with Desktop PCs
$659.99

Specs

  • Chip

    Radeon RX 9060 XT (RDNA 4)

  • VRAM

    16 GB GDDR6

  • Memory bus

    128-bit

  • Stream processors

    2,048

  • Board power

    160 W reference

  • Cooling

    Triple fan (Swift OC)

  • Interface

    PCIe 5.0 x16

What it does well

The 9060 XT 16GB clears the same two gates the 5700 XT cannot: hardware ray tracing and FSR 4. It also doubles the VRAM, and the 16 GB version is the only one to consider, because the 8 GB 9060 XT walks straight back into the trap you are trying to leave.

It is the easiest card of the three to live with. A 160 W reference board power is lower than the 5700 XT's, so heat and noise drop as well, and XFX's triple-fan Swift cooler is oversized for that load. Our RX 9060 XT vs RX 9070 verdict covers exactly where its 1440p headroom runs out.

What you give up

Raw speed is the trade. This is a smaller raster step than either 9070, and on paper the memory bus goes backwards: 128-bit against the 5700 XT's 256-bit. AMD's Infinity Cache covers most of that in practice, but it is the reason this card is a 1080p and light 1440p answer rather than a high-refresh 1440p one.

It is also the pick most exposed to street pricing. When the 9060 XT 16GB sits close to a 9070, the 9070 is the better use of the money every time.

Who it's for

A 5700 XT owner gaming at 1080p who needs the ray tracing and FSR 4 gates fixed and 16 GB of VRAM on a tight budget, and who can wait for the next cycle for a bigger raster jump.

Bottom line

If your power supply has headroom and you game at 1440p or 4K, buy the Sapphire Pulse RX 9070 XT. If your power supply is older or sized for the 5700 XT, buy the ASRock RX 9070 Challenger OC and change nothing else. If you game at 1080p on a tight budget, buy the XFX Swift RX 9060 XT 16GB, never the 8 GB version. If you are still unsure the card is the bottleneck, our upgrade-timing framework walks through the signs.

Next step

Settled on an RDNA 4 card? These are the parts the swap tends to pull in next.

FAQ

Is the RX 5700 XT still good in 2026?

For older and lighter games at 1080p, yes, it still runs them well. The problem is new releases. It has no hardware ray tracing, so games that require it, such as Indiana Jones and the Great Circle and Doom: The Dark Ages, will not launch, and its 8 GB of VRAM forces texture compromises in current titles at 1440p. It is a capable card for a shrinking library, and that library shrinks with every year of releases.

Does the RX 5700 XT support ray tracing?

No. The 5700 XT is an RDNA 1 card, and RDNA 1 has no ray tracing hardware. AMD added ray accelerators with RDNA 2, and RDNA 4 rebuilt them. That is why the gap matters more now than in 2020: some 2025 releases treat ray tracing as a requirement rather than an option, so the 5700 XT cannot start them at any setting. Any card in this article clears that requirement.

Can the RX 5700 XT run FSR 4?

No. FSR 4 is limited to RDNA 4 hardware, and the 5700 XT is capped at FSR 3.1. Community workarounds that bring FSR 4 to older Radeon cards target the RX 6000 and RX 7000 series, and reports suggest RDNA 1 is not a practical candidate for them. If you want FSR 4, the hardware step is the only reliable route, and every card in this article includes it.

How much faster is the RX 9070 XT than the RX 5700 XT?

Close to three times as fast at 1440p in demanding games. TechSpot measured the non-XT RX 9070 at 186% ahead of the 5700 XT in Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty at 1440p, 167% ahead in Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 and 156% ahead in Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered. The 9070 XT runs about 8% faster than the 9070 on top of those figures, and ray-traced workloads widen the gap further.

Do I need a new power supply to go from an RX 5700 XT to an RX 9070 XT?

Possibly. The 9070 XT draws 304 W against the 5700 XT's 225 W, and AMD's minimum recommendation is a 750 W unit. A quality modern 650 W unit can often carry it, but an older budget unit is a risk. If you would rather not touch the power supply at all, the non-XT RX 9070 draws 220 W, slightly less than the 5700 XT, and fits the system you already have.

Should I get the RX 9070 or the RX 9070 XT as an upgrade from a 5700 XT?

Decide on the power supply first, then the price gap. If your unit has real headroom and the XT costs only a little more, buy the XT for its roughly 8% extra performance. If your power supply was sized for the 5700 XT, or the XT sits well above the 9070 in price, buy the 9070. Both cards share 16 GB of VRAM, ray tracing hardware and FSR 4, so neither one is a compromise on features.

Advertisement