Affiliate Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links may earn us a commission at no cost to you.

RX 5700 XT to RX 9070 XT: Is the Upgrade Worth It? (2026)
Yes, and for a reason that goes beyond frame rate. The RX 5700 XT has no hardware ray tracing, so a growing list of new releases will not launch on it at all, and it can never run FSR 4. The RX 9070 XT fixes both, doubles your VRAM to 16 GB, and lands at close to triple the frame rate at 1440p.
The real decision is which RDNA 4 card. Buy the XT if your power supply has headroom. Buy the non-XT RX 9070 if it does not, because that card draws less than the 5700 XT you are pulling out.
At a glance
Spec | RX 5700 XT (what you own) | |
|---|---|---|
Architecture | RDNA 1 | RDNA 4 |
VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 |
Memory bus | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Stream processors | 2,560 | 4,096 |
Hardware ray tracing | None | Yes, RDNA 4 ray accelerators |
Upscaling ceiling | FSR 3.1 | FSR 4 |
Board power | 225 W | 304 W |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
Architecture
- RX 5700 XT (what you own)
RDNA 1
- RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)
RDNA 4
VRAM
- RX 5700 XT (what you own)
8 GB GDDR6
- RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)
16 GB GDDR6
Memory bus
- RX 5700 XT (what you own)
256-bit
- RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)
256-bit
Stream processors
- RX 5700 XT (what you own)
2,560
- RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)
4,096
Hardware ray tracing
- RX 5700 XT (what you own)
None
- RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)
Yes, RDNA 4 ray accelerators
Upscaling ceiling
- RX 5700 XT (what you own)
FSR 3.1
- RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)
FSR 4
Board power
- RX 5700 XT (what you own)
225 W
- RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)
304 W
Interface
- RX 5700 XT (what you own)
PCIe 4.0 x16
- RX 9070 XT (the upgrade)
PCIe 5.0 x16
Where the upgrade pays off
Your setup | Verdict | Buy |
|---|---|---|
1440p high-refresh, power supply with headroom | Upgrade now | |
4K 60 Hz panel | Upgrade now | |
1440p on an older or 650 W-class power supply | Go non-XT | |
Quiet or small-case build | Go non-XT | |
1080p, tight budget | Budget step |
1440p high-refresh, power supply with headroom
- Verdict
Upgrade now
- Buy
4K 60 Hz panel
- Verdict
Upgrade now
- Buy
1440p on an older or 650 W-class power supply
- Verdict
Go non-XT
- Buy
Quiet or small-case build
- Verdict
Go non-XT
- Buy
1080p, tight budget
- Verdict
Budget step
- Buy
Benchmarks
Relative performance with the RX 5700 XT set to 100.
- RX 5700 XT100 %
- RX 9070286 %
Relative performance with the RX 5700 XT set to 100.
- RX 5700 XT100 %
- RX 9070267 %
Relative performance with the RX 5700 XT set to 100.
- RX 5700 XT100 %
- RX 9070256 %
What changes when you swap the card
Start with the lockout, because it is new. The 5700 XT launched before AMD put ray tracing hardware on Radeon, and games have started to require it. Indiana Jones and the Great Circle and Doom: The Dark Ages both need a ray tracing capable GPU to start, so on a 5700 XT the question is not which settings to drop. The game simply does not run. Every RDNA 4 card in this article clears that bar.
Then upscaling. FSR 4 is RDNA 4 only, and a 5700 XT is capped at FSR 3.1 for good. Community workarounds that bring FSR 4 to older Radeon cards target the RX 6000 and RX 7000 series, and reports suggest RDNA 1 is not a practical candidate. Our DLSS and FSR comparison covers what the newer upscaler changes in practice.
Then memory. The 5700 XT carries 8 GB, and 8 GB is the trap of this generation: new releases at 1440p already trim texture quality to fit it. Going to 16 GB is a durability argument as much as a frame-rate one, and our 16GB VRAM breakdown shows where that headroom gets spent.
Power is where the XT and non-XT split. The 5700 XT is a 225 W board. The 9070 XT is a 304 W board, and AMD's minimum power supply recommendation for it is 750 W. The 9070 is a 220 W board with a 650 W recommendation, which means it fits almost any system that ran a 5700 XT without a second purchase.
Last, the platform. A lot of 5700 XT systems are B450 or X470 boards with a Ryzen 3000 chip, which run the graphics slot at PCIe 3.0. An x16 RDNA 4 card loses little there. The older CPU is the bigger limit, especially at 1080p, so check it against our CPU pairings for the 9070 XT before you assume the card is the only part to change.
The upgrade to buy: Sapphire Pulse RX 9070 XT
This is the card to buy if your power supply can take it.

Specs
Chip | Radeon RX 9070 XT (RDNA 4) |
VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 |
Memory bus | 256-bit |
Stream processors | 4,096 |
Boost clock | 2970 MHz |
Board power | 304 W |
Cooling | Triple fan (Pulse) |
Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
Chip
Radeon RX 9070 XT (RDNA 4)
VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
Memory bus
256-bit
Stream processors
4,096
Boost clock
2970 MHz
Board power
304 W
Cooling
Triple fan (Pulse)
Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
What it does well
The 9070 XT is the clearest AMD value win of this generation, and it is the full version of the step this article is about. TechSpot measured the non-XT 9070 at 156% to 186% ahead of a 5700 XT across its per-game results, and the XT runs about 8% ahead of the 9070 on top of that. At 1440p that is the difference between negotiating settings and leaving them on high.
Sapphire's Pulse line is the one we keep coming back to at the mid tier. The cooler stays quiet under load, build quality holds from one generation to the next, and the SKU on the box is the SKU you ordered, which matters on a chip where the XT and non-XT listings sit side by side.
You also get every RDNA 4 feature gate at once: hardware ray tracing that makes the lockout titles playable, FSR 4, 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, and PCIe 5.0, which a PCIe 3.0 board simply runs at its own speed.
What you give up
Power, and it is the whole counterpoint. You are going from a 225 W card to a 304 W card, and AMD wants 750 W behind it. A quality modern 650 W unit can carry it, as our 650 W breakdown explains, but a budget unit bought for the 5700 XT years ago is the wrong place to test that. If you need a new unit, our power supply picks for the RX 9070 family cover it.
The extra 79 W also lands inside a case that was only ever handling the old card. A case with one intake fan and a solid front panel will feel the difference.
Who it's for
A 5700 XT owner on a 1440p high-refresh or 4K 60 Hz panel, with a power supply that has real headroom, who wants to buy once and skip the next upgrade cycle.
The lower-power pick: ASRock RX 9070 Challenger OC
The same generational jump, without touching the power supply.

Specs
Chip | Radeon RX 9070 (RDNA 4) |
VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 |
Memory bus | 256-bit |
Stream processors | 3,584 |
Boost clock | 2520 MHz |
Board power | 220 W |
Cooling | Triple fan, 0 dB idle |
Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
Chip
Radeon RX 9070 (RDNA 4)
VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
Memory bus
256-bit
Stream processors
3,584
Boost clock
2520 MHz
Board power
220 W
Cooling
Triple fan, 0 dB idle
Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
What it does well
The non-XT 9070 is the card TechSpot used to measure the gap: close to triple the 5700 XT in Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty at 1440p, and more than two and a half times in Black Ops 6 and Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered. You give up roughly 8% against the XT and keep every feature.
The power story is the rare good news in a GPU upgrade. At 220 W it draws slightly less than the 225 W card it replaces, so the power supply and cables that ran your 5700 XT already cover it. For anyone on an older unit, that removes a second purchase and a rebuild from the plan.
ASRock ships the Challenger with a triple-fan cooler and a zero-RPM idle mode, so it stays silent on the desktop. At 220 W the cooler has an easy job, which is why the idle mode is usable rather than decoration.
What you give up
Challenger is ASRock's entry cooler tier, below Steel Legend and Taichi. It handles 220 W without drama, but under a long session it is audibly working where a heavier cooler would not be.
The bigger giveaway is positional. The 9070 sits close enough to the XT that buyers who could have stretched tend to notice later, and our RX 9070 vs RX 9070 XT comparison puts numbers on that gap. If your power supply has headroom and the price gap is small, the XT is the better buy.
Who it's for
A 5700 XT owner on an older or 650 W-class power supply, or in a quiet or compact case, who wants the full feature jump and nearly all of the performance without changing anything else in the build.
The budget step: XFX Swift RX 9060 XT 16GB
Every feature gate fixed, for the buyer whose budget is the hard limit.

Specs
Chip | Radeon RX 9060 XT (RDNA 4) |
VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 |
Memory bus | 128-bit |
Stream processors | 2,048 |
Board power | 160 W reference |
Cooling | Triple fan (Swift OC) |
Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
Chip
Radeon RX 9060 XT (RDNA 4)
VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
Memory bus
128-bit
Stream processors
2,048
Board power
160 W reference
Cooling
Triple fan (Swift OC)
Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
What it does well
The 9060 XT 16GB clears the same two gates the 5700 XT cannot: hardware ray tracing and FSR 4. It also doubles the VRAM, and the 16 GB version is the only one to consider, because the 8 GB 9060 XT walks straight back into the trap you are trying to leave.
It is the easiest card of the three to live with. A 160 W reference board power is lower than the 5700 XT's, so heat and noise drop as well, and XFX's triple-fan Swift cooler is oversized for that load. Our RX 9060 XT vs RX 9070 verdict covers exactly where its 1440p headroom runs out.
What you give up
Raw speed is the trade. This is a smaller raster step than either 9070, and on paper the memory bus goes backwards: 128-bit against the 5700 XT's 256-bit. AMD's Infinity Cache covers most of that in practice, but it is the reason this card is a 1080p and light 1440p answer rather than a high-refresh 1440p one.
It is also the pick most exposed to street pricing. When the 9060 XT 16GB sits close to a 9070, the 9070 is the better use of the money every time.
Who it's for
A 5700 XT owner gaming at 1080p who needs the ray tracing and FSR 4 gates fixed and 16 GB of VRAM on a tight budget, and who can wait for the next cycle for a bigger raster jump.
Bottom line
If your power supply has headroom and you game at 1440p or 4K, buy the Sapphire Pulse RX 9070 XT. If your power supply is older or sized for the 5700 XT, buy the ASRock RX 9070 Challenger OC and change nothing else. If you game at 1080p on a tight budget, buy the XFX Swift RX 9060 XT 16GB, never the 8 GB version. If you are still unsure the card is the bottleneck, our upgrade-timing framework walks through the signs.
Next step
Settled on an RDNA 4 card? These are the parts the swap tends to pull in next.
- Need more power supply for the XT? Our power supply picks for the RX 9070 family start at the 750 W tier.
- Still on a Ryzen 3000 chip? Check the best CPUs for the RX 9070 XT before the CPU caps the new card.
- Upgrading the display too? Our gaming monitors for the RX 9070 XT match the card's 1440p headroom.
FAQ
Is the RX 5700 XT still good in 2026?
For older and lighter games at 1080p, yes, it still runs them well. The problem is new releases. It has no hardware ray tracing, so games that require it, such as Indiana Jones and the Great Circle and Doom: The Dark Ages, will not launch, and its 8 GB of VRAM forces texture compromises in current titles at 1440p. It is a capable card for a shrinking library, and that library shrinks with every year of releases.
Does the RX 5700 XT support ray tracing?
No. The 5700 XT is an RDNA 1 card, and RDNA 1 has no ray tracing hardware. AMD added ray accelerators with RDNA 2, and RDNA 4 rebuilt them. That is why the gap matters more now than in 2020: some 2025 releases treat ray tracing as a requirement rather than an option, so the 5700 XT cannot start them at any setting. Any card in this article clears that requirement.
Can the RX 5700 XT run FSR 4?
No. FSR 4 is limited to RDNA 4 hardware, and the 5700 XT is capped at FSR 3.1. Community workarounds that bring FSR 4 to older Radeon cards target the RX 6000 and RX 7000 series, and reports suggest RDNA 1 is not a practical candidate for them. If you want FSR 4, the hardware step is the only reliable route, and every card in this article includes it.
How much faster is the RX 9070 XT than the RX 5700 XT?
Close to three times as fast at 1440p in demanding games. TechSpot measured the non-XT RX 9070 at 186% ahead of the 5700 XT in Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty at 1440p, 167% ahead in Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 and 156% ahead in Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered. The 9070 XT runs about 8% faster than the 9070 on top of those figures, and ray-traced workloads widen the gap further.
Do I need a new power supply to go from an RX 5700 XT to an RX 9070 XT?
Possibly. The 9070 XT draws 304 W against the 5700 XT's 225 W, and AMD's minimum recommendation is a 750 W unit. A quality modern 650 W unit can often carry it, but an older budget unit is a risk. If you would rather not touch the power supply at all, the non-XT RX 9070 draws 220 W, slightly less than the 5700 XT, and fits the system you already have.
Should I get the RX 9070 or the RX 9070 XT as an upgrade from a 5700 XT?
Decide on the power supply first, then the price gap. If your unit has real headroom and the XT costs only a little more, buy the XT for its roughly 8% extra performance. If your power supply was sized for the 5700 XT, or the XT sits well above the 9070 in price, buy the 9070. Both cards share 16 GB of VRAM, ray tracing hardware and FSR 4, so neither one is a compromise on features.
Related Articles

RX 6700 XT to RX 9070: Is the Upgrade Worth It? (2026)
Is the RX 6700 XT to RX 9070 upgrade worth it? It roughly doubles 1440p frame rates and unlocks FSR 4, and your current power supply already covers the swap.
Aug 30, 2026

RX 9070 vs RX 9070 XT: FPS in 30 Games at 1440p and 4K
RX 9070 vs RX 9070 XT in 30 games: the XT leads 1440p raster by about 10%, and draws 84W more. See which RDNA 4 card fits your PSU and panel.
Oct 25, 2026

Is 650W Enough for an RX 9070 XT? Yes on ATX 3.1 (2026)
Is 650W enough for an RX 9070 XT? Yes on ATX 3.1 with a Ryzen 5 or 7, no on a factory OC card. Here is the headroom math per CPU pairing and the picks.
Sep 26, 2026

Best 1440p Computer Monitor 2026: 5 Picks for Work and USB-C
The best 1440p computer monitor for work in 2026: 5 picks that dock a laptop over one USB-C cable, add KVM and accurate color, and still handle light gaming.
Oct 26, 2026

Docking Station vs USB Hub vs Thunderbolt (2026): Worth It?
Docking station vs USB hub vs Thunderbolt hub: which is worth the money for a gaming laptop. Bandwidth, charging and monitor limits for each tier, compared.
Oct 27, 2026